Monday, July 9, 2018

Electoral College Explained


Hat Tip: navypatriot and Suzanne Eovaldi


In their great wisdom, the United States’ Founders created the
Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why
should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the
nation? 

The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the
Internet. It should finally put an end to the argument as to why the
Electoral College makes sense. 

Do share this. It needs to be widely known and understood.

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.

Trump won 3,084 of them.

Clinton won 57.

There are 62 counties in New York State.

Trump won 46 of them.

Clinton won 16.

Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 2.5 million votes.

In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan,
Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes
than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)

Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton
winning the popular vote of the entire country.

These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.

The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.
MAGA, baby

When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles
of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of
those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome
of a national election.

Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc.) DO
NOT and SHOULD NOT speak for the rest of our country!

And...it's been verified and documented that those aforementioned 319
square miles are where the majority of our nation’s problems foment.

 Now please pass this information on. I did.

5 comments:

  1. Your map shows the electoral votes of Michigan and New Hampshire still in doubt.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Whyshould one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?"

    Because that is where American people live, and our government is by the people and for the people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Anonymous:

      So you are now including Abe Lincoln in the list of Founders? Exactly what language did HE contribute to the Constitution?

      Delete
  3. No, I am not, but Lincoln certainly had the right idea. Government is for the people, not for geography. One person = one vote.

    ReplyDelete