Thursday, November 16, 2017

Police Body Cameras Can Threaten Civil Rights of Black and Brown People, New Report Says

The following article appeared on November 14th

By Josh Saul

The number of U.S. police departments outfitting their officers with body cameras increases each year, but the cameras can pose a threat to civil rights if the departments fail to set rules that govern when officers review footage from their cameras, according to a new report.

The vast majority of the nation’s biggest police departments allow officers to watch footage from body cameras whenever they want, including before they write their incident reports or make statements, said the report, which was released Tuesday by the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.

“Unrestricted footage review places civil rights at risk and undermines the goals of transparency and accountability,” said Vanita Gupta, former head of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division and current head of the Leadership Conference, in the report’s introduction. 
Body Cam
Because an officer’s memory of an event may be altered by watching body camera footage, doing so will likely alter what officers write in their reports. That, in turn, can make it more difficult for investigators or courts to assess whether the officer’s actions were reasonable based on what he or she perceived at the time of the incident, states the report, “The Illusion of Accuracy: How Body-Worn Camera Footage Can Distort Evidence.”

Body camera programs are in place at 62 of the 69 largest U.S. police departments, according to a scorecard released Tuesday by the Leadership Conference. Most of those departments—55, or almost 80 percent—allow officers to view their footage whenever they want.

The Leadership Conference report advises that police departments institute a “clean reporting” policy, under which officers write an initial incident report before reviewing any footage. Only afterward would they watch the footage and write a second, supplementary report.

“We make the case that in the interests of consistency, fairness, transparency and accountability, clean reporting should be adopted as a standard practice for all police departments with body-worn camera programs,” writes Gupta in the introduction.

Some policing experts say officers should view the footage before writing a report to make sure the account is correct.

“They want to be as accurate as they can,” Lance LoRusso, an ex-cop and current Atlanta attorney who represents police officers, told the Associated Press. “This specter that every time an officer looks at the video they’re going to lie and adapt their statement just is infuriating because we want the officers to write the most accurate report they can.”

Ed.  It doesn't seem long ago that leftist groups were demanding that police departments across the nation be required to fit officers with body cams. In 2015, Hussein created $millions for departments to purchase the equipment.

And for a while, many were pleased with the presumption that evil cops would end their brutality if activities with the public were caught on film.

Of course, the left has realized that filming events often presents real time truth! And that results in too few cops being charged with misbehavior. 

For it is much easier to manufacture charges of malfeasance if police must write reports from memory--memory of reactions in an instant of time to life threatening events. One recollection which deviates from events captured on film and BANG...charge that stinkin' pig with...well, SOMETHING! 

But writing a report AFTER review of events? Well that means officers get too many things right! No...they didn't misbehave; no rights were trampled; no suspects mistreated. There just haven't been enough charges filed against the police because they haven't been doing anything wrong!!! 

In short, the left got what it wanted in body cams. But these pathetic clowns had foolishly nixed their own, hoped-for assault on coppers! For events recorded on film cut both ways. And the left ALWAYS want a one way street.

No comments:

Post a Comment