Wednesday, February 22, 2017

The U.S. is not a Democracy - So What Is It? Part 1




By Mark Herr, Center for Self-Governance, Administrative Staff

During my middle and high school years, I found it strange to say a pledge to the United States flag “and to the republic for which it stands,” while in the same class being taught the United States was a democracy. The teacher would correct my inquisitive nature by stating, “It’s semantics. Democracy and republic are really the same thing. The United States is a democratic republic.” Not satisfied with that justification of semantics and nuance, I continued to explore and discover the difference between U.S. republic and democracy and I’m still exploring it today.

From whom did the Framers derive the plan for America’s unique, republican form of government? 
Language of Liberty

In his book Republic (Greek: Politeia), Plato argues the definition of justice and the role of the city and the individual in discovering the definition of justice (Book I & II). He defends educating the ‘Guardians’ of a just city (the collective) at an early age (Book III & IV). And in his ‘just city’, no distinction exists between man or woman, families, marriage, private property and he proclaims the best form of government consists of philosopher kings (i.e. truth seekers, incorruptible, just men, etc.) who are the best rulers for this “good city” (Book VI-X).

Cicero, in his work Of Republic (Latin: De Re Publica), defined republic as ‘property of the public’ (Book 1: 39). He surmised that the ideal form of government was to mix monarchy, aristocracy and democracy together (Book 1: 53). In Cicero’s view, leadership of this ‘ideal’ form of government was best left to nobility (the aristocracy/the Senate) to govern the perfect republic.

John Adams, in his 1786 effort A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States, explores republican forms of government throughout world history. During the 1787 U.S. Constitutional convention, his work heavily influenced the delegates’ consideration of different forms of government.

Today, republic may be defined by SIRI and Google on your Smartphone as a ‘representative democracy.’ During the Center for Self-Governance Level 1 in-class exercises, trainees give several of their own definitions for republic. Some would suggest that republic means ‘rule of law’ or ‘rule by elected representatives.’ Others believe it means ‘rule by the people’ or ‘rule by all.’ Ironically, by the end of Level 1 they often ask, “Have we (the U.S. governed) ever functioned as the U.S. republic was designed?”

Given that no single, agreed upon definition of ‘U.S. republic’ exists, it is no less surprising that conflating the U.S. republic with democracy dominates the modern narrative in schools, the media, among political figures and in the U.S. culture at large. The Latin word ‘res publica,’ literally means ‘the public thing.’ And in Greek, the word ‘democracy’ is ‘demos kratos’ or ‘people power.’ Do the two meanings, ‘of the public’ and ‘people power’ mean the U.S. is supposed to be a democratic-republic fusion?

Let’s consider the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) otherwise known as North Korea. Is it republican in form because it is ‘of the people?’ It has a constitution and separate legislative, executive and judicial branches – so does it have checks and balances? The people vote for representation – so is rule by the people a democratic function? The parliament passes laws – so does it have rule by law? It has all the so-called structural elements of ‘republic.’ So, if democracy and republic are semantically the same thing, then the United States--being similarly structured--is like the North Korean government, right?

Most Americans would say North Korea is a totalitarian dictatorship and not a republic, because the people live under the tyranny of their “god,” the one ‘Dear Leader’ – Kim Jung Un. I wonder, after the recent elections, how many Americans would say the current president is a totalitarian dictator too? It might also be said that North Koreans are oppressed and live in slavery. The irony is that the constitution of each country guarantees the rights of suffrage, freedom of speech, equality, private property, various human rights and so on.

Some suggest that the difference between the two so-called ‘democratic republics’ may be the peaceful transfer of power after a U.S. presidential election. Considering the recent election, define peaceful transfer. The U.S. is a nation based on the social ideals of its founding leaders (Christianity), while North Korea is a nation based on the social ideals of its founding leaders (Juche). Depending on your perspective and worldview, the origins and outcomes are very different but the governance structure is still fundamentally the same.

So then, what makes the U.S. republican structure with its hint of democracy at election time different from the North Korean democratic republic? Ask yourself: can a North Korean or an American maintain any and every political boundary within their republican structure? And if they tried, what would be the end-result? The North Korean, if they attempted to maintain or steer the DPRK, would end up either executed or imprisoned. The American could similarly face execution like Lavoy Finicum at the Malheur Refuge, Oregon, or imprisonment like Ammon Bundy in Bunkerville, Nevada.

This is the important difference: The governed (that’s us, regardless of voting status) have the right to maintain the political boundaries of our republican structure. Unlike our North Korean counterparts, U.S. citizens (the governed) are free to become the keepers of their government. Americans must merely sacrifice their time to learn the system and maintain their U.S. republic daily, while periodically using a democratic control (voting). For Americans, learning the system is the key.

Throughout human history, the idea that the governed could maintain, let alone steer, their structure of government in shared cooperation with the governors was laughable, if not contemptible – until the creation of the unique, experimental U.S. republic.

In his first inaugural address, George Washington stated, “…the destiny of the republican model of government…is staked on an experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people”

Is the destiny of North Korea in the hands of the North Korean people? Of course not. But you can take the destiny of our republic into your hands by learning the system and applying that knowledge. The question is whether the American people are ready to start keeping their republic.


Mark Herr, Co-founder and President of Center for Self-Governance, was born in England to a military father and was raised in South Korea. He is a retired Air Force veteran who served his entire career in Tokyo, Japan.  Herr holds a BS in marketing & management and a MBA in finance & information systems.  As a social and political scientist, Mark devotes 289 days per year, nationwide, to studying and teaching State Constitution, Regional government, City-County government, training citizens and legislators in applied civics, and teaching high school students foundational civics. He is co-authoring the book "Speaking the Language of Liberty”.

The Language of Liberty series is a collaborative effort of the Center for Self Governance (CSG) Administrative Team.  The authors include administrative staff, selected students, and guest columnists. The views expressed by the authors are their own and may not reflect the views of CSG.  Contact them at info@tncsg.org. To learn more, go to CenterForSelfGovernance.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment