Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Adjuvant Load Vaccines and the Link to Symptoms of Autism in Children



by Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer
 
When President Elect Trump tweets, the world turns. He revealed his opinions about vaccines way back on 3-28-14, when he said: "Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with massive shot of many vaccines, doesn't feel good and changes-AUTISM. Many such cases."  Six months later he further clarified his concerns with this tweet: "I'm not against vaccinations for your children, I'm against them in 1 massive dose.  Spread them out over a period of time and autism will drop."

Now, Robert Kennedy, Jr.  may well bring to the forefront the fears of many parents dealing with the autism situation.  They just may realize significant validation as the incoming President is asking Kennedy to chair the Vaccine Safety and Scientific Integrity Commission to investigate the entire controversy. Kennedy wants especially to explore the safety aspect and look into the scientific research being done on this issue. What about the possibility of children developing symptoms of autism shortly after receiving the three-in-one shots and/or other vaccines?

Little, undeveloped immune systems of babies and toddlers may be getting bombarded too soon after birth. Another area of study concerns the adjuvant load, tolerance and the recombinant danger of foreign substances in small children, thereby producing unknown side effects.

Before Big Med and Big Media completely take over this dramatic dialogue, let's take a look at those voices who have been expressing alarm for many years, yet who have felt the virulent stings of their well-funded, heavily credentialed and very vocal opponents.  In a major legal battle, UK courts issued a stunning rebuke to the UK's General Medical Council regulatory board that had ruled against pediatric gastroenterologist Professor John Walker-Smith and Andrew Wakefield who published a 1998 Lancet MMR paper raising questions about a link to autism.   "Justice John Mitting ruled on the appeal by Walker-Smith, saying that the GMC panel's determination cannot stand.  I therefore quash it," citing "conclusions based on inadequate and superficial reasoning and in a number of instances, a wrong conclusion." This huge legal decision rocked the establishment medical profession. The exonerated doctors took action when they began to notice bowel dysfunction in 12 children shortly after receiving the MMR vaccination. The subsequent tsunami of medical criticism caused them much grief. Mr. Wakefield now is in Texas pursuing his own course of action.

In his blog post titled "A Doctor Wants Safer Vaccines and All Hell Breaks Loose," Dr. David Brownstein details the travails of Dr. Daniel Neides, a family doctor and chief operating office of the Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute, who was questioning the adjuvant load in vaccines. "Does the vaccine burden-as has been debated for years-cause autism?"  Dr. Neides pointed to the possible quandary of the vaccine protocols that, while reducing childhood communicable diseases, may also be connected to the rapid increase in autism cases.  "But not at the expense of neurologic diseases like autism and ADHD increasing at alarming rates," he posted.  A firestorm among his medical associates erupted and he was forced to walk back his blog comments.  The Cleveland Clinic said his position "does not reflect the position of the Cleveland Clinic whatsoever."

Dr. Brownstein points out how Dr. Semmelweis in the 1800's met with similar antagonism from his medical colleagues when he performed a study showing that mortality rates decreased dramatically when doctors simply washed their hands before delivering babies.  Midwives had been doing this for a long time. "The mortality rate fell nearly nine times." This doctor suffered the wrath of his peers, but now physician hand washing is an inviolate routine.  Dr. Brownstein concludes:  "Give me a break.  Our children are subjected to more vaccines than any children on the planet.  Do we have healthier children? No."

A lengthy video produced by the Health Science Institute (HSI) cites the enormous amount of money generated by the medical industry and calls attention to the huge sums Hillary Rodham Clinton received from this lobby to fuel her unsuccessful presidential campaign. This controversial video already may have been pulled from the internet.  The HSI discusses a cancer remedy that causes cancer cells to turn in on themselves. But the procedure is apparently not going forward simply because so little money is involved in this simply remedy! Current cancer treatments at present are some of the most expensive of patient protocols.

Hard to fathom is this vaccine-autism controversy when so many parents are met with ignominy when they express empirical evidence about their own children.  Why are courageous and loving doctors who buck Big Med being hammered into silence? Is the hidden component here the huge amount of money that pours into the campaigns of willing politicians who favor lobby dollars over autism victims? One study I read concludes that as many as 1 in 5 children could be affected. African-American children are seriously involved.

You can call your Senator or Representative at 1-866-220-0044 to express your opinions.  Also contact www.autismactionetwork.org, Ph. 516-382-0081. Executive Director John Gilmore is urging people to "please tweet Mr. Trump@RealDonaldTrump to support Kennedy's nomination.  Thank them for championing healthy children and standing up for the vaccine injured." Kennedy's organization is www.worldmercuryproject.org
 

1 comment:

  1. Interesting and amazing how your post is! It Is Useful and helpful for me That I like it very much, and I am looking forward vaccineshoppe.

    ReplyDelete